Side by side
Context makes the difference.
Put municipal finances alongside each other. Use matching periods, check missing inputs, and compare municipalities with similar responsibilities.
Build your comparison
Choose up to six municipalities. All figures use the same financial year.
The comparison
How to read these indicators| Indicator | uPhongoloKwazulu-Natal · B |
|---|---|
| Financial resilience | |
| Reported expenditure | R 326,8M |
| Reported revenue | R 311,5M |
| Maintenance ratio | 0,519% |
| Cash coverage | -7,036 months |
| Operating balance | -4,936% |
| Audit opinion | Unqualified - Emphasis of Matter items |
Larger spending totals can reflect population and responsibilities. Figures are nominal; an absolute amount is not a measure of efficiency. Financial resilience does not measure service quality.
Reported expenditure, side by side
Nominal ZAR · Same financial yearView exact figures
| Category | Expenditure |
|---|---|
| uPhongolo | R 326 843 940,00 |
This chart compares scale of expenditure, not service delivery or efficiency. Missing expenditure is omitted from the bars and retained in the comparison table.