Review source values
Reported asset values, cash or the repairs-to-asset ratio triggered a quality check. An unusual asset base or a source classification change may explain this. Raw arithmetic remains visible; the resilience score is withheld.
Municipality directoryEvidence note 01 Evidence note 02 Evidence note 03
2023/24 2022/23 2021/22 2020/21 2019/20 2018/19 2017/18 2016/17 2015/16 2014/15 2013/14 2012/13 2011/12 2010/11
Limpopo / B / LIM351
Blouberg
A closer look at the financial evidence behind your local government.
Reported expenditureR 409,7M2022/23
Reported revenueR 319,7MRevenue is not necessarily cash collected
Maintenance ratio0,543%Repairs and maintenance relative to the asset base
Cash coverage-4,171 monthsLiquidity indicator
Evidence has limits
A resilience score requires all three comparable financial inputs and a source-quality check. Missing or flagged values stay unavailable.
Operating deficit
Reported annual operating expenditure exceeded revenue excluding capital transfers. This financial pressure is distinct from proof of service failure.
Historical context
Follow the financial trajectory.
Revenue & expenditure
Nominal ZAR · Financial-year endView exact figures
| Financial year | Expenditure | Revenue |
|---|---|---|
| 2022/23 | R 409,7M | R 319,7M |
| 2023/24 | R 349,7M | R 373,6M |
| 2024/25 | R 458,7M | R 394,8M |
Maintenance over time
View exact figures
| Financial year | Maintenance ratio |
|---|---|
| 2022/23 | 0,543% |
| 2023/24 | 0,898% |
| 2024/25 | 0,105% |
Where expenditure goes
Eight largest reported categories are shown individually. All remaining reported categories are summed as “Other”; the exact data table lists each source category.
View exact figures
| Category | Expenditure |
|---|---|
| Finance | R 106 490 137,00 |
| Electricity | R 87 092 554,00 |
| Administrative and Corporate Support | R 68 914 819,00 |
| Municipal Manager, Town Secretary and Chief Executive | R 51 481 166,00 |
| Roads | R 22 377 255,00 |
| Solid Waste Disposal (Landfill Sites) | R 21 550 142,00 |
| Mayor and Council | R 19 739 846,00 |
| Police Forces, Traffic and Street Parking Control | R 17 801 790,00 |
| Economic Development/Planning | R 13 269 096,00 |
| Project Management Unit | R 767 400,00 |
| Pounds | R 227 069,00 |
Reporting & compliance
The audit record.
Qualified
Audit evidenceQualified
Audit evidenceUnqualified - Emphasis of Matter items
Audit evidenceUnqualified - Emphasis of Matter items
Source link unavailableUnqualified - Emphasis of Matter items
Source link unavailableQualified
Audit evidenceQualified
Audit evidenceQualified
Audit evidenceQualified
Audit evidenceQualified
Audit evidenceUnqualified - Emphasis of Matter items
Audit evidenceQualified
Source link unavailableDisclaimer of opinion
Audit evidenceQualified
Audit evidenceAn audit opinion assesses financial reporting and compliance. It does not certify service delivery or rule out all wrongdoing.
Trace each indicator
The evidence behind the view.
| Indicator | Reported value | What it tells you | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Repairs and maintenance | 0,543% | Audited annual repairs divided by reported property, plant, equipment and investment property. Reference 8%; ratios outside 0–100% need source review. | |
| Cash coverage | -4,171 months | Year-end cash divided by one twelfth of audited annual operating expenditure. Reference 3 months. | |
| Operating balance | -28,142% | Revenue excluding capital transfers minus operating expenditure, divided by that revenue. |