Review source values
Reported asset values, cash or the repairs-to-asset ratio triggered a quality check. An unusual asset base or a source classification change may explain this. Raw arithmetic remains visible; the resilience score is withheld.
Municipality directoryEvidence note 01 Evidence note 02 Evidence note 03
2023/24 2022/23 2021/22 2020/21 2019/20 2018/19 2017/18 2016/17 2015/16 2014/15 2013/14 2012/13 2011/12
North West / B / NW397
Kagisano-Molopo
A closer look at the financial evidence behind your local government.
Reported expenditureR 2,1B2023/24
Reported revenueNot reportedRevenue is not necessarily cash collected
Maintenance ratioNot reportedRepairs and maintenance relative to the asset base
Cash coverage0,163 monthsLiquidity indicator
Evidence has limits
A resilience score requires all three comparable financial inputs and a source-quality check. Missing or flagged values stay unavailable.
Short cash runway
Year-end cash covered less than one month of reported operating expenditure. Review the financial statements for context.
Historical context
Follow the financial trajectory.
Revenue & expenditure
Nominal ZAR · Financial-year endView exact figures
| Financial year | Expenditure | Revenue |
|---|---|---|
| 2022/23 | R 205,2M | R 222,5M |
| 2023/24 | R 2,1B | Not reported |
| 2024/25 | R 80M | R 125,5M |
Maintenance over time
No reported values are available for this chart.
Where expenditure goes
Eight largest reported categories are shown individually. All remaining reported categories are summed as “Other”; the exact data table lists each source category.
View exact figures
| Category | Expenditure |
|---|---|
| Property Services | R 2 136 772 973,00 |
| Economic Development/Planning | R 158 817 006,00 |
| Finance | R 54 097 231,00 |
| Libraries and Archives | R 9 710 003,00 |
| Municipal Manager, Town Secretary and Chief Executive | R 8 887 646,00 |
| Administrative and Corporate Support | R 8 138 090,00 |
| Project Management Unit | R 3 079 762,00 |
| Town Planning, Building Regulations and Enforcement, and City Engineer | R 2 559 639,00 |
| Asset Management | -R 2 885 299,00 |
| Control of Public Nuisances | -R 13 821 247,00 |
| Mayor and Council | -R 298 907 421,00 |
Reporting & compliance
The audit record.
Outstanding
Audit evidenceQualified
Source link unavailableQualified
Audit evidenceQualified
Source link unavailableQualified
Audit evidenceQualified
Audit evidenceDisclaimer of opinion
Audit evidenceQualified
Audit evidenceUnqualified - Emphasis of Matter items
Audit evidenceQualified
Audit evidenceQualified
Audit evidenceDisclaimer of opinion
Source link unavailableDisclaimer of opinion
Source link unavailableAn audit opinion assesses financial reporting and compliance. It does not certify service delivery or rule out all wrongdoing.
Trace each indicator
The evidence behind the view.
| Indicator | Reported value | What it tells you | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Repairs and maintenance | Not reported | Audited annual repairs divided by reported property, plant, equipment and investment property. Reference 8%; ratios outside 0–100% need source review. | |
| Cash coverage | 0,163 months | Year-end cash divided by one twelfth of audited annual operating expenditure. Reference 3 months. | |
| Operating balance | Not reported | Revenue excluding capital transfers minus operating expenditure, divided by that revenue. |