Audit not available
The local dataset contains no audit opinion for 2025. This does not mean a clean audit or a failed audit.
Municipality directoryEvidence note 01 Evidence note 02
2023/24 2022/23 2021/22 2020/21 2019/20 2018/19 2017/18 2016/17 2015/16 2014/15 2013/14 2012/13 2011/12 2010/11
North West / C / DC39
Dr Ruth Segomotsi Mompati
A closer look at the financial evidence behind your local government.
Reported expenditureR 893,5M2024/25
Reported revenueR 575,6MRevenue is not necessarily cash collected
Maintenance ratio0,779%Repairs and maintenance relative to the asset base
Cash coverage3,873 monthsLiquidity indicator
Operating deficit
Reported annual operating expenditure exceeded revenue excluding capital transfers. This financial pressure is distinct from proof of service failure.
Historical context
Follow the financial trajectory.
Revenue & expenditure
Nominal ZAR · Financial-year endView exact figures
| Financial year | Expenditure | Revenue |
|---|---|---|
| 2022/23 | Not reported | Not reported |
| 2023/24 | R 785,8M | R 513,7M |
| 2024/25 | R 893,5M | R 575,6M |
Maintenance over time
View exact figures
| Financial year | Maintenance ratio |
|---|---|
| 2022/23 | Not reported |
| 2023/24 | 0,334% |
| 2024/25 | 0,779% |
Where expenditure goes
Eight largest reported categories are shown individually. All remaining reported categories are summed as “Other”; the exact data table lists each source category.
View exact figures
| Category | Expenditure |
|---|---|
| Water Distribution | R 294 570 823,00 |
| Administrative and Corporate Support | R 179 105 033,00 |
| Finance | R 84 609 223,00 |
| Water Treatment | R 72 729 715,00 |
| Mayor and Council | R 72 233 473,00 |
| Fire Fighting and Protection | R 47 257 756,00 |
| Municipal Manager, Town Secretary and Chief Executive | R 43 420 349,00 |
| Economic Development/Planning | R 29 759 238,00 |
| Governance Function | R 29 588 944,00 |
| Pollution Control | R 22 516 554,00 |
| Corporate Wide Strategic Planning (IDPs, LEDs) | R 7 983 916,00 |
| Project Management Unit | R 7 185 050,00 |
| Support to Local Municipalities | R 2 209 995,00 |
| Asset Management | R 341 138,00 |
| Central City Improvement District | R 17 727,00 |
Reporting & compliance
The audit record.
Qualified
Audit evidenceQualified
Source link unavailableQualified
Source link unavailableQualified
Source link unavailableDisclaimer of opinion
Audit evidenceDisclaimer of opinion
Source link unavailableQualified
Source link unavailableUnqualified - Emphasis of Matter items
Audit evidenceUnqualified - Emphasis of Matter items
Audit evidenceQualified
Audit evidenceDisclaimer of opinion
Audit evidenceQualified
Source link unavailableUnqualified - Emphasis of Matter items
Source link unavailableUnqualified - Emphasis of Matter items
Audit evidenceAn audit opinion assesses financial reporting and compliance. It does not certify service delivery or rule out all wrongdoing.
Trace each indicator
The evidence behind the view.
| Indicator | Reported value | What it tells you | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Repairs and maintenance | 0,779% | Audited annual repairs divided by reported property, plant, equipment and investment property. Reference 8%; ratios outside 0–100% need source review. | |
| Cash coverage | 3,873 months | Year-end cash divided by one twelfth of audited annual operating expenditure. Reference 3 months. | |
| Operating balance | -55,228% | Revenue excluding capital transfers minus operating expenditure, divided by that revenue. |