Review source values
Reported asset values, cash or the repairs-to-asset ratio triggered a quality check. An unusual asset base or a source classification change may explain this. Raw arithmetic remains visible; the resilience score is withheld.
Municipality directoryEvidence note 01 Evidence note 02 Evidence note 03 Evidence note 04
2023/24 2022/23 2021/22 2020/21 2019/20 2018/19 2017/18 2016/17 2015/16 2014/15 2013/14 2012/13 2011/12 2010/11
Northern Cape / B / NC092
Dikgatlong
A closer look at the financial evidence behind your local government.
Reported expenditureR 372,6M2024/25
Reported revenueR 327,7MRevenue is not necessarily cash collected
Maintenance ratio0,063%Repairs and maintenance relative to the asset base
Cash coverage-9,869 monthsLiquidity indicator
Evidence has limits
A resilience score requires all three comparable financial inputs and a source-quality check. Missing or flagged values stay unavailable.
Audit not available
The local dataset contains no audit opinion for 2025. This does not mean a clean audit or a failed audit.
Operating deficit
Reported annual operating expenditure exceeded revenue excluding capital transfers. This financial pressure is distinct from proof of service failure.
Historical context
Follow the financial trajectory.
Revenue & expenditure
Nominal ZAR · Financial-year endView exact figures
| Financial year | Expenditure | Revenue |
|---|---|---|
| 2022/23 | R 237,7M | R 246,8M |
| 2023/24 | R 307,4M | R 359,6M |
| 2024/25 | R 372,6M | R 327,7M |
Maintenance over time
View exact figures
| Financial year | Maintenance ratio |
|---|---|
| 2022/23 | 0,92% |
| 2023/24 | Not reported |
| 2024/25 | 0,063% |
Where expenditure goes
Eight largest reported categories are shown individually. All remaining reported categories are summed as “Other”; the exact data table lists each source category.
View exact figures
| Category | Expenditure |
|---|---|
| Finance | R 178 481 361,00 |
| Electricity | R 63 500 936,00 |
| Water Distribution | R 41 837 635,00 |
| Administrative and Corporate Support | R 21 004 576,00 |
| Solid Waste Removal | R 12 361 714,00 |
| Roads | R 9 620 959,00 |
| Mayor and Council | R 9 438 535,00 |
| Sewerage | R 8 230 264,00 |
| Asset Management | R 6 776 508,00 |
| Marketing, Customer Relations, Publicity and Media Co-ordination | R 4 138 909,00 |
| Town Planning, Building Regulations and Enforcement, and City Engineer | R 3 118 138,00 |
| Security Services | R 2 539 034,00 |
| Community Halls and Facilities | R 2 278 877,00 |
| Cemeteries, Funeral Parlours and Crematoriums | R 2 038 886,00 |
| Human Resources | R 1 949 681,00 |
| Solid Waste Disposal (Landfill Sites) | R 1 859 597,00 |
| Economic Development/Planning | R 1 671 995,00 |
| Libraries and Archives | R 1 369 677,00 |
| Public Toilets | R 355 644,00 |
Reporting & compliance
The audit record.
Qualified
Audit evidenceQualified
Audit evidenceQualified
Audit evidenceQualified
Audit evidenceQualified
Audit evidenceDisclaimer of opinion
Audit evidenceDisclaimer of opinion
Source link unavailableQualified
Audit evidenceQualified
Audit evidenceDisclaimer of opinion
Audit evidenceDisclaimer of opinion
Audit evidenceDisclaimer of opinion
Source link unavailableOutstanding
Source link unavailableDisclaimer of opinion
Audit evidenceAn audit opinion assesses financial reporting and compliance. It does not certify service delivery or rule out all wrongdoing.
Trace each indicator
The evidence behind the view.
| Indicator | Reported value | What it tells you | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Repairs and maintenance | 0,063% | Audited annual repairs divided by reported property, plant, equipment and investment property. Reference 8%; ratios outside 0–100% need source review. | |
| Cash coverage | -9,869 months | Year-end cash divided by one twelfth of audited annual operating expenditure. Reference 3 months. | |
| Operating balance | -13,688% | Revenue excluding capital transfers minus operating expenditure, divided by that revenue. |